Which statement about tool conversions is true?

The statement that an input tool can be converted to a Dynamic Input tool is accurate because Alteryx allows this conversion to enable more flexible data input options. When you have a standard input tool set up for a specific data source, converting it to a Dynamic Input tool allows for the necessary flexibility to read from multiple files or sources based on parameters set in your workflow. This conversion is particularly beneficial in scenarios where the structure of the incoming data may vary or when you want to input data dynamically based on a condition or a list of file paths.

In contrast, other statements do not reflect the functionality of Alteryx as effectively. For instance, a text input tool is typically static and there isn't a built-in feature that allows it to be transformed into a dynamic input. The filter tool serves a specific purpose of filtering data and does not have a conversion path to a browse tool, which is primarily for viewing results rather than filtering them. Lastly, while converting an output tool into a macro tool may seem plausible, output tools are designed for writing data to external formats, whereas macro tools serve different functions related to workflow automation and encapsulation of processes, making this conversion inappropriate.